Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsheet who wrote (93865)	2/28/2003 2:32:18 AM
From: goldsheet	Respond to of 116753

Well, I feel much better. It took under 30 minutes to figure out 2039 was a proclamation not an executive order, and easily locate the complete text. > Don't make fun of me and my hard copy library of pre-internet cites, again, Bob ha ha ha ha ha ! It was not a long night. Internet rules !

To: goldsheet who wrote (93865)	2/28/2003 6:49:01 AM
From: Gabe Heti	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116753

Why don't you guys take your spat and carry on in private?????? Thanks

To: goldsheet who wrote (93865)	2/28/2003 2:07:44 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116753

Take it your version of what constitutes correct terminology of an EO up with researcher, Donnelly...an E.O.=an E.O. = an E.O.=an... or. ...are you now a constitutional law expert, graduating of course with higher grade standard than Donnelly?... you still >>certain FDR didn't write EO # 2039 as you said TWICE on this thread he did not author, and I informed you otherwise, and you chose to disregard, argue, and *LOSE!*... oh, did I leave out looking stupid? gold_tutor