SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (28872)2/28/2003 1:45:16 PM
From: Bert  Respond to of 36161
 
JW...Sounds like we'll get all of that no matter which way it goes..do you think bombing the sh*t out of Iraq will alleviate any of the items on your list...I seriously doubt it. In fact, I think it will intensify the reprecussions...Do you think we will go in and take Iraq and NOT control the oilfields? Can't see it myself.

If we go in without incurring civilian loss of life, I think the world will be more sympathetic to the US when/if all the things you listed come true...if we go in with a heavy hand, sympathy will not be there...If we bludgeon Iraq into submission, world thinking might even go as far as to say we deserve what's coming per your list...as far as us occupying Iraq..that is a given IMO...it's just how it gets done that's important right now. Either way, the occupying US troops in Iraq and other bases will be under the gun for some time to come...

Don't want to get into a long winded discussion here. You play your hand, and I'll play mine...again, we shall see...

Bert



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (28872)2/28/2003 5:28:01 PM
From: SliderOnTheBlack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36161
 
Tokyo-JimWillie aka "The Mouse that Roared" ~

re: ["control Iraqi oil, and you unleash dogs of Islamic mayhem"]

...the "dogs of Islamic mayhem" ?

- you mean those little Arabian Chihuahua's ?

Bring 'em on.

But, isn't that what was said about the original Gulf War ?

- and then again when we entered Afghanistan & drove the Talibanhuahua's out of power ?

The Islamic dogs were supposed to embark upon a global holy war if we entered Afghanistan ?

Remember, we were told this was going to be our next Vietnam...after all, look what happened to the Soviet Union - yada, yada, yada.

Tokyo-JW...in this endless quest of Chicken Little One-Upmanship to become the gloomiest of the doomiest Gold Mega-Bulls; why don't you just cut to the chase and predict that the World will come to an end as we know it, by May 22nd from a Thermo-Nuclear Volcanic Eruption; but, not before Gold reaches $38,303 oz and only you, Bob Chapman, Jim Sinclair & Uncle Harry held all the way to the top - which earned you 4 free tickets aboard the Hale-BoppII along with matching purple robes and a free one-way ride deep into space in search of Uranus...



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (28872)2/28/2003 5:42:06 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 36161
 
<<...control Iraqi oil, and you unleash dogs of Islamic mayhem...>>

Message 18641183

jw: nice post...The CIA needs people like you to imagine what really could happen...they have failed to educate our president on the true risks of invading Iraq and 'engineering regime change.'

Around the world there clearly is NOT widespread support for the rush to war that the NeoCONS in the Bush Administration say is 'essential'...Was Iraq behind 9/11...? Do they proliferate weapons like Pakistan or North Korea? Are we really being threatened by Iraq...? Will this 'elective war' disrupt the all important war on terrorism...?

regards,

-s2@whyisn'tTheMainstreamMediaAskingthetoughquestions.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (28872)2/28/2003 7:42:54 PM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36161
 
Bring em on. "They" are cowards of the First Kind. Apologist cowards like you are beneath even them....a coward of the second kind



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (28872)2/28/2003 7:53:27 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36161
 
dawn.com