Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (14164)	3/1/2003 7:17:40 AM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 25898

You think Pakistan is stable, huh? I haven't made any comments on Pakistan in quite awhile. I don't think there is any chance of Iran attacking the US openly (backing terrorists is another thing and more their style). Ditto for Syria. I note that Iran opposed US intervention in Afghanistan and did they attack us over our overthrowing the Taliban? No. Iran also opposed Gulf War I. Did they attack us then? No. I think you're just conjuring up threats to support your position. If, however, Iran and Syria were to attack US forces, I'm pretty confidant our military would be prepared and respond appropriately. I have no idea whether Bush has one month to resolve NK. Or how we will do so. I am very confidant that if we don't deal with the future threat Saddam poses, we will face a massively bigger danger in the Persian Gulf in the future - worse than NK.