SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Fascist Oligarchs Attack Cute Cuddly Canadians -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (957)3/1/2003 6:02:51 AM
From: Crocodile  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1293
 
I think we're setting ourselves up for a nasty shock when we've pumped all our wells dry and the rest of the world (Canada included) tightens the screws.

I may have written something about this upthread, but I think the water situation may end up being as serious (if not more so) than the fuel situation in the near future. When I've been in Arizona, I can't believe the expansion of housing that is going on, as well as irrigation-based agriculture. To give you some idea of what I mean, in 1997, while in the Phoenix area, I visited the Desert Botanical Gardens in Tempe. On the eastern side of the garden, they had a look-off area where you could look out across the desert towards the Superstition Mountains. Things were pretty much vacant from the gardens out to the mountains. A few houses here and there, but not too much. Went back and looked out from the same spot in 2001, and the landscape has pretty much filled in with housing, etc... Absolutely incredible amount of expansion.

When I was over at Taliesin West, the docent who was leading the walking tour that I was on, said that the humidity levels in Phoenix are now pretty much the same as they would be in most other U.S. cities due to evaporation from all of the gardens, swimming pools, fountains, and irrigated golf courses (and there are a ton of these in Scottsdale-Phoenix), etc...

Now, on the same trip, I was up at the high ruins at Tonto Monument, looking down on Roosevelt Lake and the Salt River Basin area. The lake is a major reservoir above Roosevelt Dam and the Salt River bringing water down to Phoenix. The lake levels were down so much that it was a bit frightening. Apparently, the anthropologists were having a heyday checking out ruins and looking for artifacts that have been underwater for several decades. The park ranger that led our group up to the high ruins has lived in the area all of his life and has never seen the water so low, and he said he thought the situation was pretty much destined to get worse.

Now, the interesting thing up at those ruins is that they were inhabited only from about 1300-1550 (or something like that). Most of the dwellings down at the basin floor and then up to the top of the mountains were built over about a 200 year period. At the beginning, there was plenty of food and people seemed to have been living well. The diversity of plant life was great at that time. However, by the end, it seems that the plants were gone, the deer that had been plentiful seemed to have been gone, the last dwellings that were built were of shoddy construction using more mud than stone as the supply of loose stone in the area had been used up. The skeletal remains of the last people to live in the area show signs of malnutrition and of death by violence (smashed in skulls, spear wounds, etc..). The prevailing theory is that there got to be far too many people trying to live in that one area, the food ran out, along with the wild game, fuel, building supplies. At some point, the people who had seemed to be peaceful enough earlier on, must have started to fight over what little food remained,.. and so it went. The people vanished from the area by about 1550.

It was rather sobering to visit those ruins a couple of days after being in Phoenix and seeing things like a stretch-Hummer limo parked in front of a car dealership, or the big reservoir-water park at Tempe. And then, to look out and see large areas of the "bed" of Roosevelt Lake exposed and cracking in the desert sun.

Well, it was all a bit ironic. But the sight of it just reinforced my opinion that there is no length that people won't go to when they want to use up the last bit of land, water, fuel, trees, plants, animals or fish. I had already thought so before, but seeing such a concrete example of how we keep messing up again and again, just made it all seem a lot clearer. I've seen this kind of thing going on all over down in the states during past travels, and now I'm seeing the same thing happening up here. Being a paddler, the "disappearance" of rivers is just a little hard to overlook.

Anyhow, one thing I do know is, that you're right about the "greater fall" thing. When supplies start to run out, things are likely to get mighty ugly because very few people will have any idea of how to get by with next to nothing. Well, that's probably enough doom and gloom for one post, dontcha think?

(o:



To: Snowshoe who wrote (957)3/1/2003 11:10:37 AM
From: E. Charters  Respond to of 1293
 
You will find because of our liberal country expansion policy and the lack of a realistic industrial/education and support policy, that Canada has a serious underemployment, unemployment and cash-crunch problem.

Successive socialist Canadian governments have refused to support mining, which constituted 40% of our foreign exchange. They had their head in the clouds about Canadian ownership and social agendas. Education and industrial/technological growth has been neglected.

IF in the 50's Canada had bought its superior military jet, the AVRO-1, from AV Roe in Toronto, then we would have had a burgeoning aerospace and electronic manufacturing industry, second to none in the world. Instead, we heard platitudes about "defense is about getting the best aircraft not supporting something home grown". It just so happened that the AVRO-1 WAS the best aircraft, so the Diefenbaker excuse did not work. And it was highly likely that at least Britain and Australia would have bought some planes from us.

Canadians themselves bred from generations of intellectually inferior field-workers who were brought here by arrogant slave-oriented governments, are not interested in investing in their own country's businesses, as their imaginations and thinking capacities are simply not good enough to consider the benefits of such a course of action. If we want money we have to go overseas to Britain, Germany or the to the US. Most of our large businesses, and our entire auto industry is foreign-owned. The majority of large industrial sectors are NOT majority owned by Canadians. We build American jets, American cars, most of our pulp and paper industry is US owned and our Iron mining industry is either US or US-shareholder owned.

What the Canadian government has chosen to do about foreign ownership, is to try to prevent foreign companies from coming into the country by such things as FIRA and CIDA. This is not a solution. The solution is to offset the risk to the tax payer by allowing investors to build companies that are 100% Canadian owned, with generous tax deductions for investment in them.

Why shouldn't a tax payer have a tax deduction for any investment? It is a capital expenditure by a person in a business project - The same as a company expending loan capital. Another thing to do, is to take off any taxes on personal capital gains, and allow capital losses to be deducted from any other gain, such as income. A loss is a loss. There should not be a penalty because the loss is in investment. We have crippled growth by our wrong headed notions about capital.

Short-sighted governments, who viewed "revenue" as a holy word, meaning only how much tax a government could collect, have, for generations crippled Canada's growth through excessive taxation. They had lifetime free capital gains allowances, and they took it back during a period of good growth and high government revenues! The purpose? It appears that it was to limit the investment in mining ventures! They had no other way of meeting budgets? They could not reduce government expenditures and the size of government. Let me tell you, the size of government in Canada has not declined one iota since 1980. Our civil service is the largest per capita and the most expensive in the world. Soldiers in the Canadian army make more than some engineers, technicians and most office workers do in anywhere else in the world. Constables in Canada make $65,000 a year. Members of Provincial Parliament in Ontario make $105,000 a year with their new 28% pay raise. And who recommended this pay raise? And "independent" government stooge, not doubt looking for favours. So it's allright, he was "independent". The pay raise stays.

All the political promises to cut costs have been hooey. -- Lies.

Stay in the States. You are better off and better governed. There is more money and more opportunity. In all my travels stateside the difference between Canadian standards and the US has been so blatant is has been embarassing.

EC<:-}



To: Snowshoe who wrote (957)3/1/2003 12:02:59 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1293
 
Wind energy was too expensive to develop, research wise in the 70's. On the other hand, once paid-down, providing the equipment is robust, it begins to make sense. I don't think Holland really was that wise in adopting steam power. They are now living in a fool's paradise like the rest of us.

We cannot, however abandon carbon fuels just like that. Our society's indutrial/transportation advantage relies on them. We can however look to fuel cells and cleaner ways of dealing with them. Coal gasification should be looked at closely. Collecting the carbonic acids and dealing with them should be a field of research too.

Coal-steam is simply the cheapest electricity you will ever see for the next 30 years. It is over twice (49% energy-theoretical) as efficient as diesel(energy theoretical 26% perhaps) if you use turbines and factor in capex.

It is interesting to note here that air-expansion engines, called combustion today, where first theorized by Sadi Carnot to be 70% efficient, if a way to use waste exhaust heat could be found.

This has never been done, and since such engines work with inlet (i.e. combustion) and exhaust temperatures being different due to cooling, not work, they lose efficiency from the inlet-outlet differential, not "gain it", as a steam engine does by this difference. (a steam engine's temperature difference is due to work, while a combustion engine does no work as its exhaust gas is being expelled and cooled, and it robs the power stroke of energy by the cooling system, as the expansion takes place of burning gases.

Do away with cooling and use all waste heat once produced, and an engine could approach 75% efficiency. It is a goal worth striving for. I have some ideas as to how a portion of this could be done in a hybrid engine. It would approximately double mileage in a conventional car and possible use the same engine.

We should be doing big time research into sun energy as once it is paid down capex wise, it is free in sunny areas, forever, too. It is hard to believe that iron and silicon sheets are pricier than building a dam across a river 1500 miles away and stringing all that cable. If we could convert photons to electrons at a 40% efficiency, (presently the max is 14% conversion), we could do away with 60% of our present electrical infrastructure. We probably wouldn't because grid redundancy has other benefits.

It is a fact that all power come from the sun. Carbon fuels and wind are from the sun's energy directly or indirectly. Life is made from carbon from photosynthesis or absorption of energy from some solar based pathway. Wind is a product of uneven solar heating and spin of the planet. Water power is a product of evapo-transpiration redistribution cycles caused by the sun. (no water runs forever without rain.) It makes sense to look at the chemical-physical direct harnessing of solar power. It can be done with solar cells, concentrator/generators, heat storage and transfer, direct heat-electrical conversion, and stirling engine conversion. It is a neglected field. Instead of doing the research and becoming self sufficient like latter-day Indians, we prefer to waste our limited fixed resources and beat up on other people to do it.

EC<:-}



To: Snowshoe who wrote (957)3/2/2003 5:07:22 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1293
 
Vicente Fox and Jean Chrétien interviewed with several other people on cbc radio yesterday, quite a good piece, some appropriate questions asked .... and slid out of by the askees, of course, since they must remain diplomatic at all times ... one profesora from UNAM managed to slap around both the Bush II regime and overly fearful mexicana reaction to it in adjacent phrases, i thought that was pretty deftly done

In the events of 11.09.01 canadians and mexicanos felt as attacked as anybody ... this fact gets lost in the noise of international posturing, it bears repeating ... we all flew the stars 'n stripes at the time, and meant it as strong statement, some of the militarists would have people forget that .... canadians and mexicanos were killed in that crime, along with nationals of about eighty other countries

I had a long post which went from that point to others composed yesterday, when my browser froze up again and i lost it .... you're bad luck to post to, Snowshoe! -g- .... but the whole thing generally led to this thought - that it is rather pointless and short-sighted for current US admin to threaten the g.w.n. and la República in order to advance its own narrow interests in a unilateral approach to a state of perma-war, when vast numbers of their own US populace question the wisdom of such a programme ... and when more are bound to, when things inevitably go wrong with the one-against-all attitude

There were several excellent Steven Rogers posts i had nailed for illustration ... this was one - #reply-18628963

'What do you consider to be sufficient grounds to justify the invasion of one nation by another?

I’m not talking about the US and Iraq here. I’m looking for a general rule, a set of criteria that could be applied to conflicts around the world. Yes, I know that the conditions in any given case must be evaluated on their own merits, but such evaluation is impossible without a basic set of premises with which to work. It is those premises that I’m looking for.
'

... the classic question, of how do you write a law that works well, and cannot be abused in its spirit .... far too much emphasis lately on the might makes right argument, imho .... which is only ever advanced by the mighty, of course, and they are always the minority among us