Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (162556)	3/1/2003 2:48:48 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578281

I still feel that the issue shouldn't be whether or not we have a war, but how we conduct it. Well, I would support avoiding war IF Saddam, before the war started, heading for exile, something like the UAE proposal. If that happened, I still think we would need to move quickly to occupy the country until it stablized, but I don't think it would have to be a war as such. As to how we conduct the war, I frankly do not believe there is a more humane way to conduct a war than what has become our standard since the Gulf War. And in this instance, the DOD has clearly stated there will be not only the effort to avoid civilians, as was done before, but also the effort to avoid destruction of infrastructure. I just don't know how we could conduct a more humane war than we do.