Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (14412)	3/1/2003 5:41:10 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Respond to of 25898

THis whole mess with Iraq is truly ridiculous. At this point Bush is telling Saddam to get rid of all his weapons so he won't be killing us while we are on our way in to kill them..................it's insane!!!! Saddam is a tyrant but he also isn't stupid. If I were him I would have some tricks left up my sleeve and I would certainly not get rid of all my weapons. The only way to avoid a bloodbath is to settle this peacefully.................without a war...........don't start it!

To: PartyTime who wrote (14412)	3/1/2003 6:07:11 PM
From: Logain Ablar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

PartyTime Ignore your hate for Bush for a momment and think about a couple of your points. 5) He's got the prime ministers of Britain, Spain and Italy in a position opposite to the will of their people. Tony Blair was the one who publicly identified Iraq as an issue needing to be addressed after the terrorism events of September 11, 2001. He was ahead of George Bush on this. Anything you might have read differently is inaccurate. 10) His "Axis of Evil" and "evildoers" rhetoric has set off both North Korea and Iran to ramp up nuclear programs in fear of the US, thus pushing the world into the fear and on the brink of a nuclear event. Actually NK started up there program prior to 9/11 and this is probably why they were included in the axis of evil. It was not until after the state of the union speech NK admitted they had started up the program and we subsequently stopped shipping aid. Maybe there is a different side your not seeing. I personally think we should go in now. Waiting does no good and actually puts our troops in greater danger. Those who want to delay this are actually supporting our enemy.

To: PartyTime who wrote (14412)	3/1/2003 6:09:57 PM
From: Crimson Ghost	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

To those sins I would add that Bush has aligned the US 100% behind Sharon and his ongoing massacre of a mostly defenseless Palestinian population with the idea of ultimately expelling them to make room for fanatic Zionist settlers. The whole world knows that the international Likudnik network is dictating US policy in the Mideast.

To: PartyTime who wrote (14412)	3/3/2003 9:33:06 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 25898

What about that list of the 18(?) pissings off of the rest of worl during is first monts?? pr-9-11 how did it go, off the top of my head Kyoto ICC (Int Crime Court) Steel protectionism, WTO China (additionally also ref WTO) hands-off policy on the Middle East, Israel-Palestine AMB (??) agreement with Russia, once again a "yellow umbrella" some stuff about starving UN health programs, that is regular anti-UN-black-helicopters x-files stuff .... And then a total 180 degree turn of the sledge after 9-11, asking for internationl cooperation to fight international terrorism, on his new found UNESCO knees through the UN gates And then messing that up too, his stuff on "irrelevant" All of it perfectly understandable and explainable, but still, by some, defined as "severe mismanagement", especially as these things do not disappear in today's world of internet archives. Ilmarinen Hmm, talking media-war, I think thee are some archived clips of Dulles flying some loads of journalists to Hollywood staged revolution in south america, I'm just waiting for some comedian figuring out to have those DC-3s landing in Baghdad