Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (78850)	3/1/2003 9:20:37 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Yes, the group-think effect varies from what I have heard (I am not an academic myself, just the daughter of one). But I think it's fair to regard tenure, like any other guild-like apprentice/journeyman/master structure (only doctors have a better, I think), as being a large structural factor inclining the whole system to group-think. That, and publish-or-perish in peer-reviewed journals. As I said but a bit differently, I think that's definitely a factor but your language makes it more structuralist than I think it works in practice. The presence of conflicting norms and conflicting positions tends to leave niches in the review process which untenured folk learn, quite quickly, to take advantage of. Sometimes to manipulate the structures such as to reinforce the group-think; others to bypass it. I'm thinking of cases but can't, for obvious reasons, type them here. And I can't, just offhand, think of a way to encode them. At least a way that would retain enough of the particulars to make them interesting.