SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (14515)3/1/2003 10:35:19 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
sent money to palestinian families that have strapped on explosives

True, and not a particularly heartwarming picture. As I understand it, payments were to any Palestinian killed in the Israli conflict and not just bombers.

Hitler may not have directly threatened us, but it was actually Hitler who declared war first after we declared war on Japan. Not, in my opinion, that the order of those actions mattered much.

If my instincts tell me that a person would acquire technology to use against other populations or the US then I'd be likely to want to strike before that person could put themselves in a position to change the future of the globe

I personally would support a U.N. sponsered ban on nuclear weapons. In the mean time, countries want to adopt them because it gives them respect. When a country leaves the third world it wants to enter the first world in a complete fashion. To possess nuclear capability really means to be of a technological level found in the U.S. between 50 and 100 years ago. If a country is forced to remain too backward it has little tie to the modern world as we know it. The various sanctions do not just try to keep the nuclear weapons out of Iraq, but all metalurgy, chemistry, biology, physics, materials science, or mechanics that existed in the U.S. well before I was born. I don't think it is possible to keep a nation in igorance to that degree.

TP