Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (162732)	3/3/2003 7:35:31 AM
From: brian1501	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575981

Kerry would have prosecuted this war smartly and would have the world behind him. Therein lies the difference. Kerry is for disarmament and not afraid of using force. He understands force. He once WAS the force. Bush has never risked a scraped knee in his life but is obsessed with war. Even though he and his team are all draft-dodgers. Bush was evn a deserter. Something is wrong there. The Commander In Chief is not the man we deserve in that position. We deserve better. Smarter. Safer. The only thing Kerry could have done better would have been to avoid the UN altogether. France et al would have opposed the war for the very same reasons they are doing so now. Obviously Bush is not afraid of force either. The rest of you comment is just useless. Brian