SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (5775)3/3/2003 9:50:08 AM
From: Bill JacksonRespond to of 6089
 
Poet, Canada will go along. As for general action against Saddam, I am in favor of it.
Draw the parallel between Hitler and Europ/Saddam and Middle east.
You can stop him now or stop him later, compared the costs.
With Hitler we stopped him later, the cost was enormous.
Would the cost to stopp Saddam be any less, esp after he had invaded and taken all the middle east oil?

Those who say he has no territorial ambitions should remember Kuwait, just like those who thought to appease Hitle gave him his little piece of the Sudetenland, for 'liebensraum'.
So Canada will be onside with the USA, when the time comes to shove.
The politicians will do some whining, but they will go where and when needed.

bill



To: Poet who wrote (5775)3/3/2003 12:14:07 PM
From: Bill JacksonRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 6089
 
Poet, Yes, Clinton was quite personable, but once he was outed by Lewinsky etc, he was doomed, still he had his 2 terms and cared little for the voters.
Now he is just a joke topic.

Aside, here is a cute little right wing lobby group cheating students.
techcentralstation.com

Bill


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News