Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (2654)	3/3/2003 2:20:05 PM
From: dantecristo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4345

Here's the picture of the former HP employee arrested by the FBI that you asked about: geocities.com

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (2654)	3/5/2003 6:10:24 PM
From: PCSS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4345

FINALLY an article about HPQ WITH reasonable balance & sanity: ************************************************** H-P unfazed after earnings question Stock shows slight gain after analysts voice concern PALO ALTO, Calif. (CBS.MW) -- Hewlett-Packard shares inched upward Wednesday as investors seemed to hold little against H-P following a report that suggested the company engaged in some fuzzy math to boost the profit picture in its personal-computing business. At issue was a report in The Wall Street Journal in which some industry analysts voiced concern with how H-P (HPQ: news, chart, profile) listed some expenses in its recent 2003 first-quarter earnings report. The Journal stated that in its report, H-P reclassified the estimates of expenses of items such as research and development and corporate-governance costs, resulting in a profit of $33 million for its personal systems group, the division responsible for PCs. H-P ended up listing those expenses in a separate category for items that aren't normally covered by a specific business area. The Journal said the classification method was one used by Compaq Computer before it was bought by H-P for $19 billion last year. Taking on Compaq's PC business was one of the biggest bones of contention surrounding H-P's merger efforts last year, and the company had highlighted the division's profit and turnaround from the $68 million loss the personal systems group recorded in its 2002 fourth-quarter. When the expenses were added back in, H-P's PC division would have remained profitable, but the company would not disclose what the division's profits would have totaled. Investors took a ho-hum approach to the Journal's report. By the time the market closed, H-P shares had risen 2 cents to close at $15.56. The Journal said that H-P's moves wouldn't result in any changes to the company's bottom line.** The company ended up posting a net profit of $721 million, or 24 cents a share, while revenue came in at $17.9 billion, missing analysts' estimates by more than $500 million. Some industry analysts chided H-P for reclassification of the expenses, saying that the company would likely face stronger criticism in the future. However, others said the expense-recording debate was little more than making a mountain out of a molehill. Richard Chu of S.G. Cowen called it a "nonissue." "It's a classification change," Chu said. "What they did was redress a problem in the way they allocated and didn't allocate expenses before. I feel that it's a change for the better because now they compare apples to apples when it comes to expenses."