Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quehubo who wrote (19540)	3/3/2003 6:56:50 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206323

that's a good thing.

To: quehubo who wrote (19540)	3/3/2003 8:56:12 PM
From: edward miller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206323

I started thinking about alternative scenarios. Did you ever think about how much demand would really have to be crushed? If just 20BCF in demand is reduced for a year, that saves 1040BCF. That might be a lot of gas, at least for whoever looses it, but I don't see that as enough to crash the entire economy. Since I have been bullish on NG I am not trying to throw ice water like Greenlaw, but I am seeing where if we don't see positive action I may want to lighten up. Comments please. Ed Miller