Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (15247)	3/3/2003 10:48:48 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

<<what explicitly do you mean by not in compliance?>> I guess Not in compliance can mean many things. To me it means "I Think" he has pursued nuclear weapons kept bio and chemical weapons and imported fringe like items such as the rockets we now know of. The hard part for me to accept is that his hands are clean yet many of us are concerned about the use of such weapons should our forces invade. I also find it difficult to accept that its all about his oil because had we wanted his oil fields we would have taken them 12 years ago. It wouldn't have been too hard. People also talk about an increase in terrorism if we attack yet some believe Saddam has no hand in that in a global level. The arguments just seem to contradict each other in many cases.