SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (162853)3/4/2003 2:00:35 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575396
 
I doubt that that's the norm,

Not only is it not the norm, it is quite certainly not the truth, either.

You have to remember that law-school students (and defense attorneys like Barry Scheck) don't have a very clear perspective on the subject. Not that prosecutors do, either.

A defense lawyer views a person as not having done the crime if they haven't been proven to be guilty "beyond the shadow of a doubt". This is, of course, a bogus standard -- what they are, in fact, is "not guilty according to a standard that is heavily weighted toward freeing the guilty rather than convicting the innocent".

A legal determination of "not guilty" cannot be taken to mean a person didn't do the crime (else, how could we account for the OJ Simpson trial?). And these college students are enthralled with the notion of making sure that person who did the crime but was not adequately proven to have done so, is freed. So is Barry Scheck.

So, I hear you. But at most, there are likely one, maybe two or three truly "NOT GUILTY" individuals who sit on death rows across the country. Even then, the chances of their being put to death versus dying of natural causes in prison are extremely low.

I would argue that by executing some of these people we might actually be able to extract some deterrent value out of the death penalty. Not that it matters; I just want these creeps off the world the rest of us have to occupy.



To: SilentZ who wrote (162853)3/4/2003 11:56:15 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575396
 
IMO the chance that the law school students are correct in their estimation is close to zero.

Tim