Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (79440)	3/4/2003 9:59:42 AM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

Michael, It was the terminal with a backpack warn by a suicide bomber. No wonder US troops got involved last week. There must have been warning regarding renewed terror activiites. Some world we live in--people blown to bits while waiting in an airport terminal. Rogue regimes with stocks of anthrax, small pox and poison gas. Nukes in NK and soon iraq and iran. And the west, once again failing the test to take action while there is still time. Only the US and GB have learned from the past. The rest will be dragged kicking and screaming into this. It wont be lindy bills flowers on the tanks that make them believers--it will be the public viewing of the WMDs once iraq is liberated. It will have a chilling effect on the peace movement and could change the political landscape in europe. Remember the pics of the germans townsfolk at the camps?? perhaps we could bring chirac and schroeder to witness the destruction of saddams wmds. Mike

To: greenspirit who wrote (79440)	3/4/2003 10:53:54 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

It does not appear to have been a suicide bombing. A backpack was left in a shelter outside the terminal. There would be no security checks in an area like that, it would have been very easy to do. Very difficult to determine who was responsible on the basis of current evidence. I've no doubt that blame will be placed on the Abu Sayyaf. It happened way outside their normal territory, though, and the subsequent explosion in Tagum (to the north) is even farther outside. It would be a fairly simple matter for Abu Sayyaf people to get there, but it would still be unusual. A number of previous bombings well outside the Abu Sayyaf area have been blamed on that group, in my opinion on very scanty evidence. The MILF territory is much closer, but that sort of action is not normal MILF practice. They have already denied responsibility, for what little that's worth. It's generally believed that the Jemaah Islamiyah network, which is based in Indonesia and Malaysia but has tendrils throughout the region, has people working in the Philippines independently of the major Muslim rebel groups. The explosives used in several bombings in Indonesia attributed to this group were acquired in Manila. The Davao bomb apparently used TNT, which is very easy to acquire here. Opinion locally seems to be shaping up in two camps: the ones that believe that it was done by Muslim extremists as a response to the US involvement, and those who think that it was set by pro-deployment groups (which include fanatical "Christian" militias with a track record of using terrorist methods) to generate sympathy for the deployment. I think the latter view unlikely, though not impossible. It will doubtless attain widespread support; conspiracy theories are popular here. We will wait and see what evidence emerges. I'm not jumping to any conclusions. One thing that is certain is that there is no way the current US deployment is going to stop this sort of thing. Odd feeling; I've passed through that airport many times, though not lately.