Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (366166)	3/4/2003 4:39:10 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

In the case of crimes against Clinton, no evidence at all is needed, just repetition. TP

To: Bill who wrote (366166)	3/4/2003 4:42:03 PM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

That's true. The standard of reasonable doubt isn't relevant in civil proceedings. But, we're talking about a criminal charge of rape. You and some others have obviously decided that President Clinton is guilty as charged. So be it. What difference does it make if you've decided that he's guilty? I think there was overwhelming evidence that OJ was guilty of murder. He should have been convicted in a criminal court, except for the politics surrounding the case and his slick dream team attorneys. But, he still is innocent until proven guilty. I don't know if there is overwhelming evidence that Clinton raped a women and I guess we'll never know since it won't go to trial.