To: LindyBill who wrote (79605 ) 3/5/2003 3:42:19 AM From: KLP Respond to of 281500 1998 articles on Iraq, the US, UN and maybe War...from a French POV... Do any of them seem to have been written today? Yep. > Le Monde diplomatique > > english edition > > March 1998 > > edited by Wendy Kristianasen > > > > LEADER > > Lessons of a non-war * > > by Ignacio Ramonet > > There are three lessons to be learned from the recent Gulf crisis. > First, the United States is now tempted to act in an authoritarian > manner, as the world's only superpower. Second, it has no overall > strategy for the Middle East and third, Europe has ceased to exist. > monde-diplomatique.fr > > Translated by Barbara Wilson > > > > UNITED STATES' DOMINATION PUT TO THE TEST > > Gulf scenario frustrated > > by Eric Rouleau > > Another Gulf war has been averted thanks to the intervention of UN > Secretary-General Kofi Annan. The United States has been forced, > for the time being, to bow to the will of the international > community and the United Nations has restored some of its > credibility. Unlike in 1991-92, the crisis has been characterised > by the refusal of public opinion to believe the disinformation put > out by the US spin doctors; and also by Washington's loss of > support from its former Middle East coalition partners on account > of its enduring double standards. > monde-diplomatique.fr > > Translated by Wendy Kristianasen > > > > What strategy to topple Saddam Hussein? > > by Faleh A. Jabbar > > Washington and Baghdad remain on a fundamental collision course > despite the eleventh-hour agreement brokered by Kofi Annan. In > addition to its declared aim of eliminating Iraq's weapons of mass > destruction, the US - frustrated by Saddam's masterly tactics - now > has a more ambitious goal: his removal. Any future air campaign > might fail to get rid of the weapons, still less get rid of Saddam. > But Washington would seek to bring into play a political agenda > based on two elements: civil insurrection and army disaffection. > Which it hopes would bring about the fall of the regime when the > storm clouds next gather. > monde-diplomatique.fr > > Original text in English > > > > When our "friend" Saddam was gassing the Kurds > > by Kendal Nezan > > Baghdad's refusal to allow UN experts to inspect the presidential > sites on which chemical and biological weapons were allegedly > hidden was taken to justify a new bombing campaign on Iraq last > month. Times have changed. Ten years ago, the systematic gassing of > the Kurdish population of northern Iraq had far less impact on > America. Only six months after the slaughter at Halabja, the White > House lent Saddam Hussein another billion dollars. And in 1991, at > the end of the Gulf war, US troops stood idly by while Saddam's > presidential guard ruthlessly suppressed the popular uprising by > the Kurds for which the American president had himself called. > monde-diplomatique.fr > > Translated by Barry Smerin > > > > Western allies divided > > by Antoine Sanguinetti > > Despite the agreement between the United Nations and Baghdad, the > United States has decided to maintain its military presence in the > Gulf. In material terms, everything remains ready for military > action against Iraq. But the legality of such action is > questionable and Washington is having trouble enlisting the support > of its allies. > monde-diplomatique.fr > > Translated by Barry Smerin > > > > Issues unresolved and resolutions ignored * > > With or without air strikes against Iraq, the Middle East will > continue to be a region of instability, full of unresolved > problems. Here is a concise background to each of the following > issues: the future of Iraq, the question of the Kurds, the > Palestinian problem, the occupation of the Golan Heights, the South > Lebanon "security zone" and weapons of mass destruction. > monde-diplomatique.fr > > Translated by Ed Emery > > > > THE DANGERS OF THE MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT ON INVESTMENT > > Wielding power behind the scenes * > > The cat is out of the bag and the world now knows just how > unbalanced are the proposals coming out of the current OECD > negotiations. The nature of this international organisation, which > is devoted to free market principles, explains why the MAI has been > conceived there. > monde-diplomatique.fr > > Translated by Julie Stoker > > > > Shackling the state * > > by Nuri Albala > > If signed, the current MAI proposals would form a benchmark for the > global investment economy, taking precedence over most existing > national obligations and agreements. The multinational corporations > would be given powerful ammunition against sovereign states and the > legal means to enforce their new "rights". It is a dynamic > agreement which would ultimately "rollback" all national laws which > did not conform. > monde-diplomatique.fr > > Translated by Julie Stoker >