Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (5135)	3/5/2003 1:25:56 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

You don't keep running the hot water once the bath tub is full; and your thermostat turns off the heat when the house is warm. If you suggesting greater conservation then I have no problem with that idea. Finding efficient ways of producing energy by reducing harmful environmental toxins can only be a good thing--with which all intelligent and rational people can only concur. 1 - CO2 is not really toxic. You have it in your body constantly and exhale it in every breath. 2 - Most ways to produce items with less CO2 or with less toxins are less efficient not more. Of course in many cases the reduction of environmental harm might be worth the lost efficiency. Tim