Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (5004)	3/5/2003 12:24:55 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

Of course the dissidents would put forward someone who appeared credible. If the group were distrusted, of course there would be concern about his veracity. Once he had given verifiable, or at least highly credible, information, he would have adequately established his bona fides. I do not find this such a problem as you do. According to Albright, he began to suspect that Hamza was passing of as first- hand knowledge material he had gotten at second hand, thus exaggerating his importance. That may be, but he does not say that Hamza did not have good material in his own area, which had to do with nuclear weapons. He also does not discuss the possibility that Hamza might have had information from co- workers that, though not always accurate, at least was substantially useful about biological and chemical munitions. In other words, he deals in suspicions......