SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rascal who wrote (79747)3/5/2003 7:10:48 PM
From: spiral3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
She understands timelines.

Not going to argue that one, but if one looks at what was reported it is quite interesting.

Unless someone has a copy of her comments, we actually don’t know what she said. What we do know is that her representative said the following:
"Sen. Clinton fully supports the steps the president has taken to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction," said Clinton spokesman Philippe Reines.

She is expressing present support for past actions, but says nothing about future support for future actions.

Orin either lacks comprehension skills or has another agenda, not that this makes her markedly different to Clinton, but anyhow she somehow managed to turn that into this:

March 3, 2003 -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton "fully supports" President Bush's Iraq policy, her office said last night - on the eve of her visit today to an upstate arsenal that makes military hardware like mortars and howitzers for U.S. troops.

nypost.com



To: Rascal who wrote (79747)3/6/2003 11:08:14 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I see. So even though she is not compelled to draw attention to herself at this time, she nevertheless puts herself on record as supporting a Bush. Very strategic.......