Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : NNBM - SI Branch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lurqer who wrote (24332)	3/6/2003 1:44:47 AM
From: elpolvo	Respond to of 104191

OWL RAT dude! <gives lurqer the high five> THAT'S COO.. EL

To: lurqer who wrote (24332)	3/6/2003 1:47:41 AM
From: abuelita	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 104191

alec- i've been waiting for you to ask that question. Owl instead, is the opposite of Pooh, the Knowledge for the sake of Appearing Wise, the one who studies Knowledge for the sake of Knowledge, and who keeps what he learns to himself or to his own small group, rather than working for the enlightenment of others. That way, the scholars can appear Superior, and will not likely be suspected of Not Knowing Something. After all, from the scholarly point of view, it's practically a crime not to know everything. But sometimes the knowledge of the scholar is a bit hard to understand because it doesn't seem to match up with our own experience of things. Isn't the knowledge that comes from experience more valuable than the knowledge that doesn't? ...and owl pontificates. pooh just is. having said that - i DO like your owl <s> hoser