SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (163084)3/6/2003 3:24:43 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572541
 
-Z,
Found it.
usatoday.com

Bush fared better when matched head-to-head against Democratic candidates in a national poll last month, running almost 10 points ahead of some of the better known candidates such as Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry and Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt, as well as New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has said repeatedly that she is not running in 2004.



To: steve harris who wrote (163084)3/7/2003 2:21:23 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572541
 
Fortunately the constitution will not let the democrats run a candidate to be named later against Bush. Even though they pulled off the NJ switch? I thought I read in the same survey that when any current dem candidate was named, Bush would defeat them but I can't find it.

You don't get it.....he loses against anybody; in other words, the Dems could run Pee Wee Herman and Pee Wee would win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bwwwwwwaaaaahahahhahaha!