SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (173336)3/6/2003 3:53:11 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, Due to free speech it seems this forum is as good as any.

Free speech has nothing to do with my argument. Obviously, I can't yank your Internet connection, so all I can do is respond to you the way I see it. You want to treat this forum like your own private venting grounds, be my guest, but with the exception of Carl, you're preaching to the wrong choir.

Re: The idea that these guys are that much smarter than the rest of the people at Intel is a joke. No way should there be such a wide gulf between compensation of execs and say regular engineers.

To some degree, yes, but executives certainly have a lot more responsibility than the engineers. They manage millions, if not billions of budgetary dollars. It is their decision-making that results in the success or the failure of the company. Engineers are problem solvers; good ones may be hard to come by, but they are still found in droves in this industry, especially these days. Good execs, on the other hand, seem to be a rare breed. Therefore, I think it's right to pay them more, as long as they deserve it. Whether or not Intel's executives deserve their level of compensation is another topic for discussion. I think it can be argued either way.

FWIW, though, I also agree with your previous comment:

"How should the executives be compensated? Salary. Perhaps a performance bonus but with a cap."