Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (16684)	3/6/2003 5:15:33 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

I cannot answer for anyone but myself. That's fair enough, I wish other liberals would be as candid and intellectually honest, thanks... Can you presume that Saddam poses a greater threat? Oh yes, absolutely... firstly, he has had twelve years to comply with the resolutions, he has failed to comply by the simple fact he has no record of having destroyed anything... secondly, he has, to date, used against his own people and his enemies every single kind of weapon his scientists have produced, he continues to murder his own people and torture children in front of their parents, and since we now live in a post 9/11 world in which he has already sworn to destroy America, he clearly posses a far greater threat than before... I may disagree with most everything you post, but you have the courage to reply to the invitation to attempt an explanation to my original post, and for that I give you considerable credit... I respect that... My Best, GZ

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (16684)	3/6/2003 5:19:18 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

re: If Saddam was such a great threat I believe that Israel would have attacked him without the approval of any other country....................that has been their MO. and they did, remeber Israel wiping out Sadam's 1st Nuclear Plant? Thanks to Israel we are not facing nuclear threat from Sadam re: AS long as inspectors are back into Iraq then we can use them and other types of surveillance to monitor Saddam's military weapons and forces. What do you think would happened with inspectors effectiveness once if Bush would take troops out of the region? Keep in mind that their current effectiveness is virtually zero. re: they are what they are and won't change unless Saddam invades another country................ you mean to say that if Sadam would decide to exterminate Kurds and UN would call for a full war you would still oppse it? Or if without invading any other country Sadam would start distributing bio weapons among various terrorist organizations in the world you wou would still be on the side of Sadam? I admire your consistency