SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (163107)3/6/2003 5:19:05 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572372
 
was listening to Blix on CSPAN last night. You know what he said...they have visited a number of Iraqi "WMD Sites" intelligence provided by the US and the UK....and they have found nothing at any of them.

So what is your point? You don't believe Iraq has WMD?

It seems the liberal argument is just all over the place. We agree, Saddam is evil; no he's not -- Bush is evil. Saddam has WMD, no he doesn't. We need the UN; we should have ignored the UN in '91. In '98, we should go to war against Saddam; in '03, war's no good. IF SADDAM DOESN'T DISARM, WE'LL DISARM HIM. No, on second thought, inspections will disarm him. But we need 5 times as many inspectors. We will use force if necessary; no, we'll NEVER use force.

All the while, Bush's position is crystal clear with a laser-like focus.



To: Alighieri who wrote (163107)3/6/2003 8:32:46 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572372
 
RE:"The war in Iraq should long be over by November of next year. Or so we are told. I am not sure about the economy though. With biblical deficits and gzillions going into the occupation of iraq and paying all those bribes...who knows."

I would say that with the way things are going Bush will have a rough time getting elected.

The standing Pres. usually inherits the baggage of the previous.

Jim