Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (80059)	3/6/2003 10:02:56 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Did it bother anybody that President Bush gave the same 2 or 3 answers regardless of the question? We knew that you, and people like you, would not "get it" the first time, Rascal. "First you tell em. Then you tell em what you told em. Then you tell em what you told em again." Repetition is the best way to inform people. lindybill@yardbird.com

To: Rascal who wrote (80059)	3/6/2003 10:03:33 PM
From: tekboy	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 281500

he stuck to his talking points. personally, I didn't think it came across well--but then, you have to ask yourself what the alternative was. I suppose it was felt that actually responding to questions, which might involve having to freelance on serious subjects, was not a good idea. tb@nocomment.com PS FADG contest: if you could have asked one question tonight, what would it have been? PPS mine: "Mr. President, according to Bob Woodward's book "Bush at War" you have said more than once in private that you believed Iraq was connected to the 9/11 attacks or the anthrax mailings. Have you ever believed that, and do you believe it now?"