SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Bomb Saddam Contest -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ferrgus who wrote (249)3/7/2003 11:55:10 AM
From: ferrgus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 261
 
And something else that bugs me... Isn't it obvious that the very NEED for inspectors is clear evidence that NO ONE expects Iraq to disarm unless it's forced to? Or, for that matter, that NO ONE trusts Saddam to do what he's supposed to do unless someone's watching over his shoulder?

And if we are forced to use inspectors, then doesn't it go without saying that Saddam can easily work on other weapons in places where the inspectors aren't around?

Sheesh! Am I missing something really obvious here, or has a lot of the world gone spineless and crazy?



To: ferrgus who wrote (249)3/7/2003 12:09:41 PM
From: Runomoâ„¢  Respond to of 261
 
Since it's pretty much certain that the US will be doing it alone, the UN inspectors may not need to leave this time around.

They actually could give a last (false) hope to Saddam, that the UN might still be able to stop and prevent the US from invading....

Mo