Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (80177)	3/7/2003 2:22:00 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I, too, am talking specifically about the PR war. I would define "PR success" as polls in Muslim nations that consistently showed support for the U.S. It is one of my core beliefs, that we cannot win the War On Terrorism (more accurately, a War On Violent Islamism) alone. So, building a coalition is a necessary precondition to any lasting military victory. And we cannot build coalitions, when the populations of our potential allies, are 90% against us. When we, not Iraq, are seen as the Rogue State, by the people of South Korea and France and everywhere in between, we are on the road to defeat. First in the polls, then diplomatically, then militarily. I have this Sense Of Impending Doom, when I see the fascists (Saddam) and 8th Century theocrats (OBL) winning the BattleForHeartsAndMinds. Unilateralism is a Dead End, because: 1. We are only 5% of the world's population. 2. we can never get adequate access to the battlefield(s) 3. the other developed economies must work with us, in order for any economic pressure or weapons embargoes to work. 4. The winning strategy in this War, is 90% non-military effort, and only 10% military. Our current efforts show the opposite priorities. We began a hesitant, small, flawed HeartsAndMinds PR campaign in Muslim nations, and abandoned it as soon as Muslim governments (including our "allies") objected. We won't convince anyone, if we aren't even talking to them. Again, it's an access problem, and unilateralism shuts off access.