Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Win Lose or Draw : Be A Steve, Make A Call -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (5475)	3/8/2003 11:44:57 AM
From: farkarooski	Respond to of 11447

dude, whether you are for or against the war won't make a difference now bottom line is --- there will be a war, so let's just pray it will over fast and have minimal casualties (both U.S. and Iraq) and minimal cost (economic and non-economic) this farking world is getting scarier and scarier !!!

To: mishedlo who wrote (5475)	3/8/2003 12:04:56 PM
From: Softechie	Respond to of 11447

US media is facking nuts...glorifying death and destruction and public loves it...until it happens to them...

To: mishedlo who wrote (5475)	3/8/2003 3:47:35 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11447

What relevance does this have to do with Bush stopping the war, are you thinking they actually give a damn what they hear? Hell the the only who does care is Ashcroft who happily would wiretap every home in america and arrest any one having any anti war attitude as potential terrorist and therefore can be arrested.Ashcroft is a dangerous man. Why does my absolute certainty that war will start in March can be viewed in ANYWAY shape or fashion opposed to your views?????? Max

To: mishedlo who wrote (5475)	3/8/2003 4:18:19 PM
From: LTK007	Respond to of 11447

i think WLD said it best when he awakened me to the fact that thru Shrub we have had the Whitehouse invaded by the old boys still alive from the Nixon days--hell Kissinger is huge behind the scenes, that war criminal. You know the most immediate reason we REFUSED to allow that americans could be tried for war crimes is that there was a serious movement to have Kissinger tried for war crimes and brought to The Hague. just one of many links on the matter. zpub.com a couple quotes <<bring Henry Kissinger to justice for crimes against humanity. Consider, though, what happened to the last people to talk even jokingly about plans for a citizen's arrest of *the real-life model for Dr. Strangelove.* ... An indictment of Henry Kissinger for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes would include (but not be confined to) the following(max edit-that from Village Voice , link to full article in this site, as with all sources). ...>> << - Welcome to the "Henry Kissinger: Unindicted Terrorist" file! ... Incredibly, Henry Kissinger—the man who rivals Pol Pot for the dubious honor of being the person responsible for the death of the largest number of innocent people in South East Asia (and far surpasses Pol Pot in criminality when one factors in Kissinger's various levels of responsibility for wholesale slaughter and repression in other parts of the world)—still wields significant power in the United States; but his role as eager facilitator of mass murder, totalitarian repression and other atrocities is never discussed in polite society. Masterminded the murder of as estimated 600,000 peasants in Cambodia (the "Secret bombing")>>