Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (43716)	3/8/2003 2:11:35 PM
From: Tom Pulley	Respond to of 52237

Very well said! In another post you said I don't buy the Oil argument, or the revenge argument, or finishing business argument. So why on earth does BUSH want to risk his political career on attacking IRAQ?. I agree completely and believe that anyone who has an open mind and has paid any attention to Bush's speeches or actions can see that he is simply doing what he thinks is "the right thing to do". There are no hidden motives beyond that. Just as successful stock market players have to have the confidence in themselves to go against the majority from time to time, so must great leaders of companies and great leaders of countries. Bush is willing to go against the world majority in this case based on his vision of how to beat back terrorism on a long term basis and make the United States and the world a safer place. As far as leaders being affected by politics however, seems to me that the France and Germany economies are falling further and further behind; and the politicians love having an issue to take their population's mind off the failure of their country to compete. Tom