Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lurqer who wrote (43718)	3/8/2003 1:46:51 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 52237

I dont outright trust anyone, but you have to give me some motive for why he is lying to attack. Just doesnt add up. I dont buy the Oil argument, or the revenge argument, or finishing business argument. So why on earth does BUSH want to risk his political career on attacking IRAQ? not to mention Tony Blair who is no dope. I believe Bush thinks having a democratic IRAQ and bases for US will help imporove USA influence in the area. I think he believes there is enough circumstantial evidence to risk going to war over. Wheres the beef man? By the way my forte is in Politics and government, history too. Trading is a hobby-ng I have studied extensivly on the nature of facts, the history of distorting facts etc, as well as graduating in the highest % of American History students in the country. Unless someone can give me some good argument for WHY bush is lying other then he is trying to dominate the world then I am all ears. By the way if you want to argue that Iraq ocupation and pressure point strategy wont work, then you may be on to something. However the other stuff is nonsense.