Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (4284)	3/9/2003 1:45:56 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5582

Danny I agree with Mike's comments regarding short selling. While short selling can temporarily depress a stock price, it won't have a sustained effect if the company's sales and profits keep increasing. Eventually the stock price will go up whether shorts cover or not. Nobody can manipulate a stock over the long term, whether it is longs or shorts. And Mad2, you skirted around the issues Please explaine why the price problem with MTXX today is due to short sellers as Mike claimes and you apparently agree with. 941,000 shares short in Nov 1998 going for 7-8 bucks and 360,000 shares short today. With short's having been net buyers of 581,000 shares how the hell can you suggest that MTXX should have a higher valuation if it weren't for the wicked shorts? Just another example of you taking a narrow and one sided view of a issue. Lets see, insider selling, options, Davidson deal.....all things you and Mike claimed were insignificant. These are the reasons the stock is flat to down. Supply/demand, too much supply of stock and not enough demand. mad2 mad2

To: DanZ who wrote (4284)	3/9/2003 2:15:39 PM
From: Hank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5582

Dan, I can't even begin to reply to all the so called points in yet another one of your excrutiatingly long responses except to say that: 1) The clinical trials are not valid and prove nothing. Any expert in conducting clinical trials (except those paid by MTXX)can tell you that. Your continued insistance that they are valid is false. The fact that you are content to rely on the word of MTXX paid researchers instead of seeking out an independent and unbiased opinion means you are a phony and don't care to know the truth. 2) What countless testimonials? All I've ever heard were testimonials from people here who owned stock. Where are the independent poll results from Ziscam users nation wide to confirm this statement? Your comments are a complete fabrication. As for the suggestion that Ziscam Allergy and Extreme Congestion etc etc will be the big runners up to propel this company into the stratosphere even though they contain absolutely nothing new - That statement is so naive it doesn't even deserve a response.