Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (80690)	3/9/2003 12:37:38 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Under what circumstances would you consider Saddam to be an imminent threat? Let me amend that question to include a qualifier, C2. The present state of argument is that the threat would be sufficiently imminent that the US would invade without UNSC support. Credible evidence of participation in planning of 9-11 would be the big one. The second would be credible evidence of close ties with Al Q now. I think the UNSC would support invasion should either of those be present. I'm deliberately leaving the issue of nuclear weapons off the table because I see that as a part of a bigger issue of finding global means of containing their spread. The UNSC simply has to be a part of that.