SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (154052)3/9/2003 5:02:24 PM
From: Alomex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
The good news is that this viewpoint (which imo is very valid) is getting press now. Reporters aren't sucking up to Bush anymore now that he is falling in the polls, and they are asking these hard questions.

I sure hope so. Like Nero playing the fiddle while Rome burns, Dubya invades Iraq while the economy goes down the drain...

We were supposed to have a $800 billion surplus, it has now turned into a $1.7 trillion deficit, and all that Dubya can do about is (a) invade Iraq (b) increase the deficit further by cutting taxes for the top 3% wealthy Americans (wealthy Americans, like, er.... himself). Even Alan Greenspan is against the tax cut and he is no bleeding heart liberal.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (154052)3/9/2003 7:48:04 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
The UN is a place where childish nutball dictators can feel on par with legit nations. It has been for may years. The iraq troubles are simply highliting teh inneffectiveness of this distasterous entity.

If the UN had any effectiveness at all, this situation would still not be out there festering. Sad but true.