SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (163527)3/9/2003 1:55:37 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574257
 
To think that a document written over 300 years ago

2003 - 300 = 1703.

Hmmmm....clearly, written by a true historian...



To: tejek who wrote (163527)3/9/2003 1:59:38 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574257
 
ted,
The founding fathers knew too well what right and wrong is. Character does matter and I don't know why the liberal left like you want to destroy the constitution.

Is it your "if it feels good do it" mind set?

Or is it "if I don't get caught, it isn't illegal"?

Your buddy Clinton has set a great example for you; it appears you have followed it well.

Steve



To: tejek who wrote (163527)3/10/2003 8:56:03 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1574257
 
The amendment process is too unwieldy for every nuance of law that needs modifying. Logic should tell you that.

Not every nuance needs an amendment. The constitution does not lay down every specific law. It only lays down the areas where the government should have power and the general nature of that power, and the limits on it. These things SHOULD be hard to change.

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News