Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (80724)	3/9/2003 2:35:21 PM
From: kumar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Iraq has destroyed, IS destroying all of its weapons of mass destruction. I see a contradiction here : Iraqs declaration after 1441 said "it had none". So how come it is destroying something it claims not to have ? "Caught Lying" is how I see it. How many more lies to go ? And what potential disasters to await, while more lies are in the process of being discovered ?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (80724)	3/9/2003 2:48:21 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 281500

'The alternative in two words is: NO WAR.' Personally i would amend this to 'no war at this time in this manner', Karen .... i think it's pretty clear that the species generally and the iraquis specifically would be much better off without Saddam Hussein et al .... while it is also clear that they do not form the clear and present danger to us that do Bush II et al, i believe that they too should occupy a position quite high up on the hit list of a working international parliament of democracies There are never only two alternatives to an issue, until that narrowed choice is forced by someone ... it's not just 'war now' or 'no war', there are many more possibilities