SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (163538)3/9/2003 7:50:55 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573718
 
Show me where the courts have actually changed the law......not rule on one, but changed it.

Courts change the law by ruling on it. Any first year law student will tell you that judicial decisions is one of the primary sources of new law. Do you not understand the basics of our legal system?


Its state legislatures and Congress that create and change laws, not the courts. The courts interpret the law. When laws have been passed that violate one of our founding documents, the courts identify the error and then, its up to the offending jurisdiction to remove that law or to change it. Understand......the courts are not changing the laws but rather insuring that the law is consistent with the intent of our founding fathers. Its the local jurisdictions that are trying to make all the changes. Its a hard concept for the right to get.

As to your question, how about:

Rowe v. Wade
Gideon v. Wainwright
Miranda v. Arizona
Helvering v. Horst


Let's take Roe[not Rowe] vs Wade......the courts determined that preventing legal abortions was not consistent with the intent of the Constitution and the individual's right to privacy. After that ruling, the states went about removing the offending laws and passed new laws to permit abortion in the first trimester.

You get the idea.

Actually, I hope you get the idea......I am tired of having to tutor the right.

ted