Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (163624)	3/10/2003 2:22:06 AM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1574273

Or perhaps the defector was coerced, or was lying, or was mistaken. Perhaps. No; on the defector's information, which was given to UNSCOM, program was uncovered and those aspects of it were destroyed (the defector, the son-in-law, was then coaxed to return to Iraq where he was shot by Saddam). The point is, they DID have an active Nuke-you-lar program, IAEA was saying just what they're saying today (i.e., we find no evidence of such a program), then after receiving info from the defector it turns out they were quite close to having a weapon. Thus my statement, on defector is worth more than a bunch of inspectors.