Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (5332)	3/10/2003 11:55:52 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

"You must have a very misinformed idea of Canadian criminal law... I have little to no information on Canadian criminal law. I have always just assumed it is similar to US law.

To: Solon who wrote (5332)	3/10/2003 12:36:40 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

<< AJs point was that these behaviors are..."coddled and nurtured". Then his point was without merit.>> There's a difference between "tolerated" and "coddled and nurtured." Those without tolerance often don't see the distinction or see a slippery slope. If the intolerant would simply tolerate, that would obviate the potential slippery slope because the tolerant would not have to take affirmative steps to protect the "deviants" from the intolerant, thus giving the appearance of support and nurturing.