SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (5345)3/10/2003 1:13:44 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7720
 
In Canada even ridiculous religious cults like this are protected...

mirror.co.uk



To: Solon who wrote (5345)3/10/2003 5:28:54 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7720
 
They should of course be protected from mass murder (I don't know if the crime would rightfully be called genocide but if you consider homosexuals to be a nation, tribe, ethnic group ect. , then they should also be protected from genocide). But the law doesn't seem to me to be about genocide but rather speech. Apparently it already applies to certain ethnic or racial groups. Can you get arrested in Canada for using an ethnic slur or wearing a t-shirt with a racist slogan? If the amendment passes will you be able to say "I don't like homosexuals", or "homosexual activity is sinful" without facing prosecution? I don't know. My knowledge of Canadian law is minimal. Peter Stock seems to imply that there is a danger of such arrests and prosecutions happening. Perhaps he is wrong.

Tim