Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (18730)	3/10/2003 5:52:22 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

No, Albert. Please read and understand what I write when I write it. Geez, including Bush himself, any absurd accusation is always ready and handy to be drawn from rightwing wordslingers. Read carefully, please! I am not justifying Saddam having WDM. From an intellectual perspective only, I draw the possibility (read p-o-s-s-i-b-i-l-i-t-y) that Saddam is withholding chemical weapons which he'd use in defense of Baghdad. And I pointed out that his prior history of use of such materials backs my conjecture. And the point I'm making is these chemicals weapons, if they exist, would not be used were an invasion not happening. Furthermore, on a scale and degree of possession of weapons of mass destruction, Iraq is way down the list of priority. It's just that Iraq happens to be convenient for what Bush thinks he needs to do. I'm telling ya, he really wants to win this war and come out a hero to his dad, as much as he wanted to win ball games when he was a part-owner of the Texas Rangers, a place where I wish he would have stayed. Unfortunately, it's people lives--ours and theirs--who hang in the balance of this ego and the ulterior economic motivations for waging this war.