SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (163830)3/11/2003 10:24:29 AM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573824
 
Zo Re.. A baby and a fetus are two different things, though not according to this administration.


In other words, if the mother would have been fast enough, and killed the child before its head came out of the womb,thereby performing a partial birth abortion, then it would have been okay. How humane. And if Gw goes fast enough, and aborts Saddam fast enough, then it will be okay with you?



To: SilentZ who wrote (163830)3/11/2003 11:36:03 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573824
 
Z, <A baby and a fetus are two different things>

We're not talking about that. And besides, neither the Constitution nor the Roe vs. Wade decision ever brought up that issue.

We're talking about the "right to privacy" and how it applies to murder. Why is killing the unborn protected under the "right to privacy," but not killing the recently born?

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News