SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (163837)3/11/2003 9:42:01 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574007
 
>Can you explain? Not just to me, but to the 100s of thousands, or millions who died because of Saddam. Why is it better to have a killer on the lose than other alternatives.

Most of the people he's killed were in the context of war- Iran/Iraq, Kurdish uprising. Not that he wouldn't kill more if he had a chance.

Millions more could die in a post-Saddam civil war that could really drag the Middle East further down.

I'm not sure how far back you've read my posts, but I'd like to reiterate that I'm not opposed to this war on typical liberal principles. My opposition to the war is recent (in the last couple of weeks), and it's only due to sensing that the administration thinks that rebuilding Iraq will be a walk in the park and that the people of Iraq would more or less seamlessly form a functioning democracy themselves, if not for Saddam.

I'm looking for a Marshall Plan here, and the administration is giving me Afghanistan. Unlike most I'm unhappy with statements such as "we'll stay as long as we have to and not a minute more." We're likely going to have to occupy Iraq for a decade or more, and if we're unprepared, it really could be worse than it is now. We have to basically tie the hands of the different ethnic groups in Iraq, as well as those of Turkey and Iran, and not allow them to fight each other, while we take care of the nation-building.

If Colin Powell or Donald Rumsfeld were to come out today with a realistic rebuilding plan, I'd be in full support of the war again.

-Z



To: Joe NYC who wrote (163837)3/11/2003 12:39:16 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574007
 
<deleted>



To: Joe NYC who wrote (163837)3/11/2003 12:40:00 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574007
 
It's just not that simple. As bad as Saddam is, a power vacuum in Iraq would be worse.

Can you explain? Not just to me, but to the 100s of thousands, or millions who died because of Saddam. Why is it better to have a killer on the lose than other alternatives.


Saddam's death totals grow with each week the US is stalled in the UN. Do you have creditable links [and not Iraqwatch] that support your supposition that Saddam has killed millions?

ted