Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (163874)	3/11/2003 12:22:42 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573792

Ted, The Sup. Ct. deals with issues that are controversial and beyond the scope of legislatures and the lower courts. Yes, they are supposed to set precedent, but the Roe vs. Wade is unprecedented, and the precedent was not followed. Nobody uses Roe vs. Wade as a precedent setting case for anything privacy related. Address what? Roe vs Wade? I thought we were talking about the right to privacy. Yes. Rather than just privacy, we are discussing the fact that legislatures would need to prohibited from legislating on anything privacy related (as in Roe vs. Wade), which the article does not discuss. Joe