Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (163885)	3/11/2003 12:42:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573841

Z, <Because I can't. It's what I believe.> Allow me to clarify and say it's what you believe to be a life. In other words, it all depends on what your definition of a "life" is. Tenchusatsu

To: SilentZ who wrote (163885)	3/13/2003 6:48:55 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573841

>Do you see the logical fallacy in associating the "right to abortion" with the "right to privacy"? Why can't you associate the "right to kill a newborn in a bathroom" with the "right to privacy"? After all, if a woman wants to do that, it should be no one else's business but hers, right? Because I can't. It's what I believe. Examine the logic of the decision for a moment, instead of examining it as a policy that you would support or oppose. How does a "right to privacy" become a right to an abortion, unless its a right to do anything in private? I could make a reasonable argument for making abortion legal, even though I would disagree with the argument, but I can't see any reasonable argument that the constitution requires that abortion be made legal. If I had to make such an argument the only way to go would be to BS my way through it. Tim