Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spytrdr who wrote (369788)	3/11/2003 4:29:55 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Who cares?

To: Spytrdr who wrote (369788)	3/11/2003 4:32:25 PM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 769667

Boy, they're quick to take action...... ~SB~

To: Spytrdr who wrote (369788)	3/11/2003 4:35:57 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

What did Yugoslavia do to us? How many Americans did they kill? Please provide a link to the professor's analysis of the legality of that war.

To: Spytrdr who wrote (369788)	3/11/2003 4:43:03 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Who cares what some geek professor thinks....????

To: Spytrdr who wrote (369788)	3/11/2003 4:44:01 PM
From: H-Man	Respond to of 769667

John Norton Moore, disagrees... Moore is one of the most preeminent lawyers on national security matters and in international law. How many of those professors have any expertise in this area? Since Iraq is in violation of the cease-fire agreement of 1991, they are wrong. A factor they no doubt conveniently forgot. Moore: "If ultimately the use of force proves necessary to compel Iraq’s acceptance of its Resolution 687 obligations a credible legal argument is also available that the Security Council’s initial authorization in the Gulf War to restore peace and security in the Gulf area has been reinvigorated by Iraq’s failure to comply with its cease-fire obligations originally set by the Council. While a subsequent Security Council resolution authorizing the use of force would supply the legal gold standard for any use of force, it is reasonable to regard Security Council conditions imposed for a cease-fire in the Gulf War as requirements for the maintenance of that cease-fire; and thus material non-compliance with these conditions would rescind the cease-fire itself." Read more from John Norton Moore, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for National Security Law at the University of Virginia. Formerly he served as the Counselor on International Law to the Department of State and as a United States Ambassador. virginia.edu PS: Image that A group of anti-Bush lawyers challenging US plans. Oh the humanity!