SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldworldnet who wrote (369873)3/11/2003 7:15:38 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
<<Even if we didn't invade Iraq I wouldn't vote for a Democrat.>>

About 64% of living Americans have also come to that conclusion. 2002 injured the Marxist/Leninist anti-American left. 2004 will bury them.

Someday we will og on here because it will be the only place left to view the extinct American left...



To: goldworldnet who wrote (369873)3/11/2003 7:17:42 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Puff Daschle can do soaps when he's unemployed in 2005. They'll call him the "King of Whine".

Maybe Bush will make him Chief of the Bureau of Indian Affairs(:->)...



To: goldworldnet who wrote (369873)3/11/2003 8:22:59 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
A Democrat President wouldn't have the world pissed off.
Wouldn't say "my way or the highway" to our friends. He'd work to earn their trust and form a strong coalition FIRST. I know John Kerry would have a large coalition if he tried something like this.

But if Bush really wanted Saddam out ASAP he should have just sent in Delta Force or a bunker-buster and tried to take him out. Criticism be damned. Turns out he doesn't care much what people think anyway so why did he just waste six months of the world's time? And why risk thousands of US lives and spend 100-200 billion on an invasion? Only reason I can see is the oil. Otherwise not worth it at all.