SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (81394)3/11/2003 11:22:25 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 281500
 
I watched Fouad Ajami on "Charlie Rose" last night, and he is getting pissed. His reaction is that going to the UN allowed the anti-war pressure to build up, which is costing us allies. He is right, of course. But if Bush had not gone to the UN, the screaming would have been even louder.

Yes, I saw the interview too. I don't think the screaming could possibly have been louder if Bush had not gone to the UN. Really loud screaming only happens when people think they can influence someone. And that fine old saying comes to mind "it's always easier to get forgiveness than permission..."

My conclusion? Boy, was Dick Cheney right. In spades. I wonder what Colin Powell's private view of the matter is now?



To: LindyBill who wrote (81394)3/11/2003 11:39:51 PM
From: kumar  Respond to of 281500
 
But if Bush had not gone to the UN, the screaming would have been even louder.

I'm not sure. I was watching Kissinger on CNN earlier in the night, and he said US could have invoked Article 51 of UN Charter (we deem we are under threat from a hostile nation in a hostile region and working in self defence blah blah), and that could have been the end of it. Seems to me Kissinger gave the current administration kudos for attempting to go the extra mile, and commented 'its time to cut loose'. His prediction : unless Saddam is deposed/retires, war before end-March.