Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (154120)	3/12/2003 11:33:06 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<<I wonder what Europeans have to say about what you state as unfettered support for SH and their business relationship with him and Iraq. >> It's the French and Germans. The german economy is in a shambles. Both the germans and france want to continue to make lots of money from their patron saddam. <<I have not heard any details of this, and would certainly (a) expect that the aggressive and perhaps arguably more politically knowledgable populous would pursue as unjust such actions by their gov't, and (b) hope that the media of the US and the rest could bring such a facet to light. >> The details are available and it's taken a while but the information is getting into mainstream media outlets.

To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (154120)	3/13/2003 9:59:17 AM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

Randy, how's this for support? Seems GST's Chinese buddies and the peace-loving French have been selling Saddam rocket propellents in violation of UN prohibitions. Read the whole article - NYT is free. The French Connection By WILLIAM SAFIRE France, China and Syria all have a common reason for keeping American and British troops out of Iraq: the three nations may not want the world to discover that their nationals have been illicitly supplying Saddam Hussein with materials used in building long-range surface-to-surface missiles. nytimes.com