SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (81469)3/12/2003 12:05:42 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The German was weak, but did point to a position I consider to have some merit. His countrymen have seen too much of war, and have a deeply pacifist streak. Though I consider pacifism dangerous when it unduly influences a nation's foreign policy, it is difficult to argue with the notion that foreign policy should not reflect the underlying desires of a nation's citizens.

Well, yes, but the distinction the ambassador elided over, was whether the Germans should have this right to decide on their own course, or should have the right to make the decision for everybody else as well. Nobody is asking Germany to supply troops.



To: carranza2 who wrote (81469)3/13/2003 12:42:57 AM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 281500
 
German pacifism is fine, and German politicians catering to the will of their electorate is fine. It's when German pacifism becomes an obstacle to unreasonably constrain others, that I have a problem with it.

Derek